On Classical PCF, Linear Logic and the MIX Rule
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study a classical version of PCF from a semantic point of view. We define a general notion of model based on categorical models of Linear Logic, in the spirit of earlier work by Girard, Regnier and Laurent. We give a concrete example based on the relational model of Linear Logic, that we present as a non-idempotent intersection type system, and we prove an Adequacy Theorem using ideas introduced by Krivine. Following Danos and Krivine, we also consider an extension of this language with a MIX construction introducing a form of must non-determinism; in this language, a program of type integer can have more than one value (or no value at all, raising an error). We propose a refinement of the relational model of classical PCF in which programs of type integer are single valued; this model rejects the MIX syntactical constructs (and the MIX rule of Linear Logic). 1998 ACM Subject Classification F.3.2 Semantics of Programming Languages, F.3.3 Studies of Program Constructs, F.4.1 Mathematical Logic
منابع مشابه
An Executive Approach Based On the Production of Fuzzy Ontology Using the Semantic Web Rule Language Method (SWRL)
Today, the need to deal with ambiguous information in semantic web languages is increasing. Ontology is an important part of the W3C standards for the semantic web, used to define a conceptual standard vocabulary for the exchange of data between systems, the provision of reusable databases, and the facilitation of collaboration across multiple systems. However, classical ontology is not enough ...
متن کاملLecture Notes on Classical Linear Logic
Originally, linear logic was conceived by Girard [Gir87] as a classical system, with one-sided sequents, an involutive negation, and an appropriate law of excluded middle. For a number of the applications, such as functional computation, logic programming, and implicit computational complexity the intuitionistic version is more suitable. In the case of concurrent computation, both classical and...
متن کاملA judgmental analysis of linear logic
We reexamine the foundations of linear logic, developing a system of natural deduction following Martin-Löf’s separation of judgments from propositions. Our construction yields a clean and elegant formulation that accounts for a rich set of multiplicative, additive, and exponential connectives, extending dual intuitionistic linear logic but differing from both classical linear logic and Hyland ...
متن کاملGIL: A Generalization of Intuitionistic Logic
We introduce GIL, a new logic inspired by linear logic, focusing and polarization. GIL is a unified logic in which connectives from intuitionistic, classical and linear logic can mix with few restrictions. Systems that resemble it include Girard’s logic LU, although GIL is best considered a generalization of intuitionistic principles. Intuitionistic logic is seen as a less-complete version of G...
متن کاملProof Theory for Full Intuitionistic Linear Logic , Bilinear Logic , and Mix Categories
This note applies techniques we have developed to study coherence in monoidal categories with two tensors, corresponding to the tensor–par fragment of linear logic, to several new situations, including Hyland and de Paiva’s Full Intuitionistic Linear Logic (FILL), and Lambek’s Bilinear Logic (BILL). Note that the latter is a noncommutative logic; we also consider the noncommutative version of F...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015